Occult and scientific mentalities in the Renaissance. From the publication of his 1984 Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance if not before, Brian Vickers has vigorously maintained that “the occult sciences,” in which he includes alchemy, astrology, and natural. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance . Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Download (pdf, 58.21 MB) Read online Mirrors: Post a Review. The Occult Sciences in the Renaissance. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above. Project MUSE - Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance (review)This collection is the result of a symposium held at the Eidgen. It is appropriate that the institution that had Jacob Burckhardt, Albert Einstein, C. Jung, and Wolfgang Pauli on its staff should sponsor an exploration of this topic. At the symposium, thirteen scholars from such diverse fields as the history of science, cultural history, literary history, and political science attempted to trace and differentiate the complex and intertwined movement from the occult and irrational mind to the scientific and rational mind during the period 1. Title: Book-Review - Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance: Authors: Vickers, B.; Park, K. Publication: Journal for the History of Astronomy, Vol.17, NO. John Dee and Renaissance occultism. Lund: Lunds Universitet. Occult & Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Frances The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance EPUB ebook. Author: Brian Vickers. Other Format: PDF EPUB MOBI TXT CHM WORD PPT. Race and Renaissance. Brian Vickers (literary scholar). Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance (1984) editor. The question of whether modern science emerges from a cluster of magical, occult, and quasi- rational intellectual activities is explored at length in several of these papers. As in any collection of this kind, the papers vary greatly in quality, depth, and novelty. There is a superb inroduction by Brian Vickers who surveys the past treatment of the topic, especially by historians of science who have generally brushed aside any role for occult thinking in the development of science, and describes the growing realization amongst a host of scholars in the history of thought that Hermeticism, Neo- Platonism, Alchemy, and Cabbalism all played a vital role in the development of Renaissance ideas, including scientific ones. Many of the papers in this volume raise more detailed questions about some of the new generalizations which have grown up in this field and focus sharply on both the similarities and differences in occult and scientific thought. Vickers summarizes much of this research in his introduction. He also discusses many of the particular controversies between scholars concerning the interpretations of such thinkers as Kepler, Newton, Bacon, Agrippa, Paracelsus, Fludd, and many others. Finally, Vickers indicates the light that might be thrown upon these issues by modern psychological, psychoanalytical, sociological, and anthropological studies. The essays include studies of John Dee by Nicholas H. Clulee; on the occult . Hine; a study of nature, art, and psyche in the thought of Jung and Wolfgang Pauli and the latter's analysis of the Kepler- Fludd polemic by Robert S. Westman; an examination of the controversy between Cardano and Scaliger by Iam Mac. Lean; two essays on Kepler's alleged astrology, mysticism, and numerology by the late Edward Rosen and by Judith Field; a consideration of Bacon's biological ideas in his recently discovered manuscripts by Graham Rees; an examination of Newton and alchemy by Richard S. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. BOOK REVIEWS 599 tradition in English Renaissance universities by Mordecai Feingold; the rejection of occult symbolism by Vickers; Mersenne's views on Renaissance naturalism and Re- naissance magic by. Westfall; two studies on witchcraft and demonology by Robin Briggs and by Stuart Clark; and a concluding essay by Lotte Mulligan on . Westfall raises this problem and, only briefly, the further problems of reconciling the scientific Newton with the Newton who is deeply indebted to the spiritological metaphysics of Henry More and the Cambridge Platonists and who pursues, throughout his long life, the meaning of the Biblical prophecies in Daniel and Revelations. Why should Newton be incapable of researching into biblical chronology, composing alchemical treatises, and pursuing the mathematization of physics, all in the same..
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |